President Trump is attempting to secure another significant legislative victory with the “Save America Act,” which would begin to restore some semblance of fairness and propriety to an election system that has become deeply subverted over the last decade.
The timing of the proposed law is critically important considering that we are just months away from the 2026 midterms, an election that will decide who keeps support for both chambers of Congress.
For these reasons, passing legislation now that would advance the cause of election integrity is of pronounced importance.
Democrats have cheated and rigged elections with ever increasing amounts of shamelessness, a treacherous pattern that has only accelerated in recent election cycles.
This, of course, culminated in the Big Lie of 2020, an election marred by impropriety due to last-minute rule changes, ballot harvesting and dumping, illegal voting, and machine hacking.
Having now had over half a decade of investigations and research into our fraudulent election systems – supplemented by countless other instances of Democratic-induced fraud observed in cases as wide-ranging as Minnesota childcare centers to New York and California-based illegal alien housing and schooling schemes to Joe Biden’s mental decline and coverup – one would think Republicans in the Senate, a chamber not known for its wisdom, would at least be intelligent enough to ascertain the urgent need for election reform.
As people say, the issue has become “low hanging fruit” – it is an “80/20” issue, with overwhelming majorities of Americans on both sides of the political spectrum believing that a minimum of presenting a driver’s license is not only reasonable, but a necessary requirement before exercising one’s right to vote.
The idea that elections have not been federalized, or are the exclusive province of the states, has been completely undermined by the last one hundred and fifty years or so of the Republic, beginning with the ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment, which allows the feds to regulate state electoral processes in the interest of rooting out instances of race-based discrimination.
The passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which is universally celebrated by liberals, is another hallmark example of federal authorities overriding state control of election processes.
While it is true that the Constitution primarily delegates electoral procedures to state legislatures, Article I does grant carveouts.
Article I, Section 4, the so-called “elections clause,” for instance, allows Congress to “by Law make or alter such Regulations” otherwise prescribed by the States – allowing federal lawmakers to override or standardize election procedures by federal law as it sees fit.
In the context of civil rights, the federal government has been no stranger to intervening in state election processes to prohibit literacy tests and grandfather clauses, which traditionally restricted black voters from gaining access to the franchise.
In modern times, however, the problem is not that election processes are too strict, but too lenient.
The problem has gotten much worse over the years, as millions of illegal aliens have entered the homeland and not shockingly began appearing on voter rolls.
Certain states run by Democratic governors, like Minnesota and Pennsylvania, have been hostile towards offering transparency to their voter rolls.
In critical swing-states, the fact that voter rolls have been tough to audit has made it almost impossible to validate the legitimacy of popular vote outcomes.
So much of that process is now left to reliance on the word of highly dubious authorities, like Tim Walz and Josh Shapiro, two of the most dishonest politicians serving as governors in America today.
What makes both Democratic and some Republican resistance to national election integrity standards even odder is the fact that virtually zero resistance came from these same culprits to the rollout of Real ID requirements, which have become mandatory for travel, over the last year.
Real ID dovetails with the election integrity issue in several notable ways. Not only is Real ID one valid form of voter ID under the rules proposed in the draft legislation, but furthermore, the constitutional arguments in favor of each are similar.
Both are representative of federal regulation of an inalienable right. In the Real ID context, the right in question is the right to travel, which the Supreme Court has repeatedly found, like voting, to be protected under the Due Process clause.
Even the bottom-line issues to justify each are similar: the driving concern for national security, which is prevalent in most conversations surrounding the need for Real ID, is also present in the context of election integrity reform, where election procedures, in their current condition, have an outsized risk of being compromised by malevolent actors, both foreign (i.e., illegal aliens diluting the voter pool), and international (i.e., cyber-attacks from countries like China).
In both cases, the Department of Homeland Security plays a key role as well. DHS has been instrumental in standardizing Real ID over the past year in travel; the Save Act would equally grant DHS with the authority to cross-check state reported voter rolls with a national database, to ensure only eligible citizens are exercising the right to vote, further bolstering a sacred privilege for all Americans.
Ultimately, the Left’s irrational hostility to very basic guardrails to protect the integrity of America’s elections is of course driven not by a moral principle, but by a desire to retain power and de-legitimize the Trump administration and its America First policies.
The excuses Democrats use to express opposition to the proposed law are bogus – there is zero evidence to support any ridiculous claim asserting that black Americans have significant challenges accessing ID requirements, such as a birth certificate, passport, or driver’s license, for registration than their white counterparts.
The argument contending as much is inherently racist, since it implies black people are less capable of securing basic ID requirements than whites.
Furthermore, we know that the argument is completely disingenuous, since no Democrat has voiced anything remotely comparable to the opposition of the Save America Act in the related context of Real ID requirements, which impose very similar regulations upon all Americans in the context of travel.
Not only have Democratic voices been more muted in the latter context, but when Real ID came up for congressional vote in 2005, the appropriations package in which it was contained passed the Senate unanimously.
The group of Democratic senators who signed onto that bill notably included Chuck Schumer, who today is strangely one of the loudest antagonists of the Save America Act despite his approval of Real ID.
To any American with an iota of common-sense, the reasons for passing the Save America Act are obvious and numerous.
It is long past due that our country experienced an overhaul of its election procedures, in the name of election integrity.
This is particularly true since 2020, where procedures were changed on a whim, using the pretext of a fabricated global pandemic, all for the purposes of removing and banishing President Trump from the political arena.
Since 2020, more fraud and corruption to state governmental procedures, not only in the election context, but in myriad other contexts, have come to light.
In case after case, states largely run by Democratic governors and state legislatures have demonstrated a strong propensity towards fraud – particularly those which have declared themselves “sanctuaries” for illegals, the ultimate telltale that unconstitutional and unlawful acts are the modus operandi.
The Constitution grants extraordinary powers to the federal government to clean up election processes.
The right to vote may be fundamental, but it loses its significance if the procedures in place cannot meaningfully distinguish between citizen and non-citizen.
Where non-citizens and other pools of ineligible voters begin to exercise the franchise en masse, it further degrades the integrity of the overall democratic system, while undermining the legitimacy of the governing bodies who derive their authority from such illegitimate procedures.
This explicates why the Senate must follow the House of Representatives in passing the Save America Act, and further accounts for why, at this late stage, federal intervention may be the only antidote to reverse the damage already inflicted on our election procedures over the years by bad-faith actors seeking to bring American democracy to heel.
The post Why The ‘Save America Act’ Will Make America’s Elections Safer, Fairer, and Freer appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.