Minnesota’s Somali community has been treated for years as a political talking point rather than a population that deserves honest evaluation. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz insists the community poses no financial or public-safety burden. Democrats frame all criticism as racism.
But the numbers tell a different story—one that Minnesotans have been asked to ignore even as the state confronted one of the largest welfare-fraud schemes in U.S. history.
Federal prosecutors uncovered a $250–$300 million network of falsified child-nutrition and Medicaid claims, much of it operating through organizations rooted in Somali enclaves.
The total fraud is now estimated by some to exceed $1 billion. The scandal reflects deeper structural problems tied to human-capital realities that Democrats refuse to acknowledge.
Minnesota has a population of about 5.7 million, including approximately 107,000 Somali-born or Somali-American residents—roughly 1.5% of the state.
Yet according to state data, about 58% of Somali Minnesotans live in poverty, or roughly 62,000 people, compared with 530,000 Minnesotans overall. That means the Somali community represents nearly 12% of the state’s total poverty population despite making up less than 2% of its residents.
This imbalance translates into real fiscal consequences.
Minnesota spends billions annually on welfare-related programs. Using per-capita calculations, the Somali poverty footprint represents an estimated $2.8 billion in yearly public-assistance obligations.
That burden falls on taxpayers—many of whom were never told the scale of the dependency they were financing.
State leaders also insist Somali Minnesotans do not disproportionately contribute to crime. Governor Walz has repeatedly made that claim without supplying data to support it.
The federal record tells a different story.
Across the United States, Black migrants make up 5.4% of immigrants, yet account for 20.3% of immigrants facing removal because of criminal convictions. That category consists mostly of East Africans, including Somali nationals.
Minnesota’s own criminal prosecutions reinforce the trend. A significant share of the state’s recent federal indictments involving fraud, money laundering, organized theft, and benefits abuse have been connected to East African networks.
None of this means every Somali immigrant commits crimes. But it directly contradicts the Democrat narrative that the community represents a lower-than-average risk.
To understand why Minnesota’s social-service system is overwhelmed, we must engage with the human-capital indicators of countries of origin.
Somalia ranks near the bottom of nearly every global development index. The country’s adult literacy rate is approximately 31%, according to UNESCO. Secondary-school completion remains below 20%.
The World Bank reports that Somalia’s population averages less than three years of formal schooling, one of the lowest levels on earth.
These indicators matter because they strongly correlate with employment outcomes, welfare dependence, and the rate at which newcomers integrate into advanced economies. Low educational attainment is a structural reality that shapes long-term results.
Somalia’s average IQ is estimated at around 68, placing it within the range typically used to classify significant cognitive-skill deficits.
While these estimates come from international intelligence and psychometric surveys rather than U.S. agencies, they illustrate the same underlying point reflected in all recognized human-capital measures: Somalia faces extraordinary developmental challenges.
When a country’s literacy rates, schooling years, and cognitive-skill indicators all rank near the lowest in the world, it is unrealistic to assume its refugee populations will seamlessly integrate into high-skill, high-productivity economies without substantial cost and long adjustment periods.
The United States does not apply a uniform standard to every region on earth, nor should it.
Every country conducts risk-based vetting.
When travelers arrive from Colombia or Honduras, they undergo more aggressive narcotics screening because the trafficking risk is higher. When they arrive from Norway, they are unlikely to receive the same scrutiny.
Somalia is a nation with decades of civil conflict, widespread corruption, weak governance, and severe educational collapse.
Treating Somali migration as identical to migration from stable, high-development countries is not fairness—it is negligence.
Effective immigration policy recognizes that countries with profound human-capital deficits require more rigorous screening, longer integration timelines, and higher scrutiny.
None of this denies the presence of hardworking, law-abiding Somali Americans who have built successful lives in Minnesota.
A responsible immigration policy never targets individuals based on identity. It evaluates populations based on measurable indicators tied to economic and security outcomes.
The United States was built on the principle of welcoming individuals who can thrive here, but it also has an obligation to avoid policies that impose disproportionate costs on taxpayers or create vulnerabilities that officials pretend do not exist.
Minnesota’s experience is a case study in what happens when political leaders substitute narrative for analysis.
The debate surrounding the Somali community must not revolve around ethnicity, religion, or culture. The real conversation concerns data—poverty figures, crime statistics, education levels, and human-capital indicators that would be impossible to ignore in any other policy domain.
Minnesota is now paying the price for refusing to acknowledge what the data has been saying for years: human-capital realities matter, and ignoring them does not make their consequences disappear.
The post Somalia’s Average IQ Score Meets the U.S. Standard for Intellectual Disability appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.