Jack Smith’s case against President Trump showed that the only criminals involved were Jack Smith and his corrupt associates.
The Conservative Treehouse released a video of Jack Smith’s interview before Congress. Smith shows a rotten soul who believes he is God. His efforts to get President Trump were based on what he thought Trump thought.
I don’t care if you support Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis or the Easter Bunny, any American who doesn’t realize the tenuous future of our union, after reviewing the information within this testimony, is going to forever live in a collapsed dystopian nightmare, if they vote for any political representative who supports it.
The House Judiciary Committee has released the [VIDEO] and [TRANSCRIPT] of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition. What is outlined within it is alarming in the extreme. I strongly urge anyone with any platform to review the details and quickly highlight the content therein. There is no time to waste.
The predicate for Jack Smith to prosecute President Trump for his efforts to “interfere in the 2020 election”, and thereby “challenge all democratic norms”, essentially boils down to Jack Smith accusing President Trump of participating in a fraud when he challenged the outcome of the 2020 election.
To get beyond President Trump’s first amendment right to free speech, Jack Smith claims Trump knowingly understood that Joe Biden had won the election; President Trump was told by senior Republican advisors that Biden had legitimately won the 2020 election; President Trump rejected the reality of the “truthful information” presented to him, and instead chose to launch a psychological operation against the American people, i.e. “fraud.”
It is the charge of “fraud” which underpins the entirety of the case against Donald Trump, as pursued by Jack Smith. The charge itself is predicated on definitions of what constitutes truthful information, and within that subset of predicate you begin to realize just how important it is to professional leftists that they control information.
The case was dropped after the results of the November 2024 election, won by President Trump. However, if President Trump had not won that election, the prosecution would have continued.
Jack Smith notes in his testimony, in the most Machiavellian way, that his primary prosecution approach was to present “Republican” witnesses like Mike Pence, who Smith cunningly said he could not discuss as he was restricted from revealing grand jury testimony.
Smith was prepared to present witness testimony from Pence and other political “Republicans” who told President Trump that Joe Biden had legitimately won the election, and Trump needed to concede. This testimony then forms the baseline for the definition of “truthful information” that Trump rejected out of a malice mindset to continue clinging to power.
In essence, Smith defines what is “truth” (Biden won), then outlines how that truthful information was delivered and how President Trump dismissed it. Therefore, President Trump’s “mens-rea”, or state of mind, was one of promoting an intentional falsehood. According to the Lawfare approach selected by Smith, this mindset is the predicate that blocks President Trump from using his First Amendment right to speech as a defense.
Intentional fraud is not allowed under the protections of “free speech.” Jack Smith wanted to prove that President Trump was engaged in intentional fraud, and wanted to prove his mindset therein through the use of Republican political voices who delivered information to President Trump.
Jack Smith sought to define “truth”, and then counter the free speech defense by mob agreement on what constitutes the “truth.” Under this predicate, President Trump was being prosecuted for a thought crime, and Jack Smith sought to legally prove he knew his thoughts.
This was evident some time ago. That if you disagreed with the lies behind and emanating from the Jan 6 Committee, then you are a liar.
They destroyed half the information they received in their wild goose chase and then claimed, based on only what was retained, that President Trump lost the 2020 election, and he lied when he claimed otherwise.
“If You Don’t Agree with the Jan 6 Committee, You’re Basically a Liar” – Jack Smith’s Case Against Trump in a Nutshell
What happened after the stolen 2020 election was as egregious as the election steal itself. These many liars and soulless people running the Jan 6 Committee, Schiff, Raskin, Cheney, et al, believed that their lies were going to be bought by the people they stole the election from.
The American people didn’t believe their lies. The American people disagreed with their corruption, crimes, and lies.
The real question is whether any of those who stole the 2020 election and covered it up will be held accountable.
If you need a complete assessment of what happened in the 2020 Election, get your copies of – The Steal.
The post Corrupt Criminal Prosecutor Jack Smith Wanted to Indict President Trump Based on What Smith Thought Trump Was Thinking appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.