Britain’s ongoing mass immigration crisis has reached a critical tipping point, and for the first time in generations, a bold patriotic, national-conservative movement has stepped forward with a no-nonsense, fully fleshed-out strategy to reclaim control of the nation’s demography and secure its future as a sovereign homeland for the British people.
Restore Britain, a right-wing, anti-globalist initiative launched in 2025 by Independent MP Rupert Lowe (formerly of Reform UK), has released its landmark policy paper, Mass Deportations: Legitimacy, Legality, and Logistics, authored by Harrison Pitt. This comprehensive blueprint lays out a clear, lawful, and practical path to remove every illegal migrant from British soil—potentially within two to three years—while rejecting the weak compromises and moral posturing that have allowed the crisis to fester under successive globalist governments.
Founded by Lowe, the MP for Great Yarmouth, Restore Britain initially operated as a cross-party patriotic coalition before announcing just days ago that it would transition into a traditional political party. It seeks to rally disillusioned voters who have watched in frustration as unchecked mass replacement migration—both legal and illegal—has eroded British identity, strained public services, depressed wages, and destroyed national cohesion as well as social trust.
Restore Britain membership is booming over the last hour.
Join the party.https://t.co/ThjMPgca5I pic.twitter.com/guSl90a0Km
— Restore Britain (@RestoreBritain_) February 17, 2026
The movement’s core mission is to restore parliamentary sovereignty, protect the English nation from engineered demographic change, and end the unauthorized experiment in population replacement that no electorate ever endorsed.
The 100-page policy paper directly confronts the harsh realities now facing Britain. Restore Britain estimates 1.8 to 2 million illegal migrants are currently in the country—a number far exceeding official figures and much larger than Britain’s armed forces.
This number isn’t representative of a mere administrative glitch, the document argues, but a profound attack on the legitimacy of the British state itself. A nation whose government fails to—or simply refuses to—enforce its borders has, in effect, ceased to function as a sovereign state and forfeited meaningful self-determination.
Rejecting the liberal elite’s view that border enforcement and demographic conservation are somehow inhumane, Restore Britain correctly presents mass deportation as the essential duty of any self-respecting government. The plan begins with dismantling the legal barriers that have prevented and paralyzed action for decades.
Key proposals include repealing or overhauling restrictive laws such as the Immigration and Asylum Act, the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act, and—most controversially—the Equality Act 2010, which the paper describes as a tool weaponized against nationality-based policies through vague “indirect discrimination” clauses.
At the heart of the legal overhaul is Britain’s entanglement with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Human Rights Act. Overly expansive interpretations of Articles 3 and 8 have repeatedly blocked deportations by invoking “family life” rights or hypothetical risks in home countries—even for repeat violent criminals and overstayers.
Restore Britain advocates full withdrawal from the ECHR, acknowledging short-term diplomatic challenges (including Northern Ireland implications) but insisting that restoring true sovereignty requires it. As an interim or complementary measure, the paper proposes the innovative Great Clarification Act, which would empower Parliament to override judicial decisions by a simple majority when vital national interests are at stake—reversing Britain’s long drift toward judicial supremacy over elected lawmakers, a trend that has proven deeply damaging.
Turning to the practical, realworld implementation of policy, the paper outlines a multi-pronged enforcement strategy designed for efficiency and scale rather than symbolism, optics, or political marketing. It emphasizes a revitalized “hostile environment” policy: mandatory e-visas for legal status verification, strict Right-to-Work and Right-to-Rent checks with severe penalties for non-compliant employers and landlords, biometric banking requirements, and the closure of loopholes like “safe surgeries” in the NHS that subsidize illegal residence.
Voluntary returns form the strategy’s backbone, with incentives aligned to encourage self-deportation—drawing lessons from effective US models under President Trump. The authors project that voluntary departures could outnumber forced removals by a ratio of three to one, enabling the entire illegal population to be cleared in a relatively short timeframe.
For those who refuse to leave, forced removals would ramp up through expanded Immigration Enforcement teams (recruiting former military and police), increased detention capacity at repurposed RAF bases and secure sites, and a fleet of charter flights, commercial seats, and military transports. Countries that refuse to accept the return of their nationals would face visa restrictions, reductions in aid, remittance taxes, and trade penalties.
The plan also demands retrospective measures, including revocation of improperly granted asylum statuses, and rules out any future amnesties that would only encourage more abuse. Costs are acknowledged as substantial in the short term but seen as a vital investment: long-term savings in welfare, housing, healthcare, and policing would more than offset the expense, delivering a net gain for British taxpayers and communities.
Public backing is overwhelming, the paper notes. Polls show majority support across every region—including London—for deporting all illegal migrants, with more than half of voters saying they would back MPs who champion such policies. This reflects deep public frustration with a political class that has long ignored the will of the people on this existential issue.
Far from an isolated immigration proposal, Mass Deportations stands as a broader manifesto for Britain’s national renewal. It rejects discredited liberal universalism, activist courts, and the fatalistic acceptance of demographic decline in favor of unapologetic defense of British continuity, democratic self-rule, and national integrity.
The post Restore Britain Party Unveils Blueprint for Mass Deportations and National Renewal appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.